Monday, June 15, 2009

The Path Less Travelled?

As of last January, I joined a research group under one of my profs, studying engineering education, focusing specifically on project-based learning and gender. I absolutely love it.

Now, I've always been really interested in girls and the sciences. My mum was a Physics major who was told to major in Home Ec and now owns her own computer network consulting business that she built from the ground up. I've been involved with Girl Scouts, the Anita Borg Foundation/Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computer, and Sally Ride Science Camps, working to get/keep girls interested in sciences, and am a member of my school's SWE chapter. Gender and engineering is something right up my alley, one would think.

As I said before, I absolutely love my research. It's utterly fascinating and makes me think hard about the world that I am surrounded myself in.

But sometimes I wonder... is it making me think too hard?

Now, up until senior year of high school, I'd never had a male science teacher, and my streak was only broken by my two computer science teachers. I've always been surrounded by strong, female scientists who have always encouraged me and, god dammit, I'm good at science. Yet, I too fall prey to the insecurities that is common for women in the sciences. Am I smart enough for this? Do I really want to be studying that? Why can't I speak up, even if I know the answer?

The worst part, I think, and what is still bothering me, is the guilt. I'm going into bioengineering, hoping to do immunology or genetics or drug development or biotechnology or something like that. I'm even pre-med, hoping to get my M.D./Ph.D., so I can study the human body and the human immune system and do research. Every time I mention that that's what I want to do, I general get some variation of "Wow, that's ambitious. You're going to be in school forever, you know?" (which, thank you, I do know). Pursuing a double degree like that supposed to be really, really hard.

So why do I feel as if I'm wimping out and taking the easy path?

Bioengineering is one of the most women-heavy engineering fields.

Both of my parents highly encouraged (read: groomed) me to go into computer science and electrical engineering. I was sent to computer camp at the age of 8. If I wanted to, I could definitely be a computer scientist and/or electrical engineering. Yet, I run in the opposite direction, purposefully not thinking about computers, unless I absolutely have to.

My mum got her master's in Medical Science, but managed to do so without taking a pure Biology course, ever. She is very disdainful of Biology, and thinks it's an easy option.

Sadly, that is a relatively common opinion amongst my peers, despite the fact that Bioengineering is growing in popularity, as a major. We don't really need as many math or design courses as the other engineers, and are generally thought of as not really engineering or the wimps.

For my research, I read all these papers about how there aren't many girls in Computer Science or Physics, and how percentages are dropping every year. My mother would be thrilled if I went into either of these fields, and I do have the aptitude towards them, if I put my mind to it. I don't have an aversion into going into either field, and I feel as if it's my duty, as a well trained, intelligent, and confident female, to go into these fields and increase the number of girls in CS, through my own participation and/or encouragement of others.

I love Biology, and it can make me really, really happy. Yet I feel as if I'm betraying my training by going into something that isn't difficult, that I don't have to fight for acceptance. If I can withstand the pressure that society and these fields make females entering them undergo, am I wasting resources by going down an easier path?

-J

1 comment:

nilgolodh said...

I think the important point is that you're doing bioengineering because you "love Biology." Yes, it might be a cause for concern if you were choosing bioengineering because it was easier for women, but from what I've read, you aren't.

Yes, it is noble to advance the cause of women where you are able, and yes, you are more than capable of entering CS, if you wanted, and increasing the number of females by 1 in that field. However, you have responsibilities to more than just your gender, and you have methods of aiding your gender other than denying your passion in order to enter a field where women are more under-represented.

You have a right and a responsibility to pursue your passions- people accomplish so much more when their hearts and souls drive them along with their moral compasses. You are already working for women in engineering- your own list of activities attests to that, and you say you enjoy what you are doing there. Why can you not continue to aid in the same way, while still pursuing that which you love? A great woman in a medical field, one making break-throughs and loving every minute of it, would be far more beneficial for women in technical fields, I think, than a highly skilled female code-monkey wondering when eight hours will finally be over.

It is not enough that women know that they can succeed in Computer Science or Physics. They must also have a driving passion to pursue said success.

A shame it would be for a capable woman to not be allowed to discover and develop her love for CS or Physics because of societal pressures, and I know that is what you must wish to avoid for future generations. But so too would it be a shame for a woman fully cognizant of her passion to deny her calling because of those same societal pressures, though she works against them.

Having said all that, if you decide to do CS, all the power to you. We could code into the wee hours together ;)

All the best.